The French and Arab-Muslims became
allies in the 1960s after France lost Algeria and formed the French Mediterranean
policy, which sought relations with Arab nations. The French recognized
the importance of aligning with oil-rich countries and had dreamed,
under De Gaulle, of France becoming a dominating world force again.
The Arab-Muslims wanted to expand Islam throughout Europe and of
course propagate more anti-Semitism and anti-Americanism. They found
mutual benefits in an alliance with France.
The then European Community was not interested yet in the
Arab-Israel conflict and France could not entice its European partners
to align with the Arabs to isolate America across the Atlantic Ocean.
Well, not until after the Arabs lost a third war, the Syro-Egyptian
war against Israel in October 1973.
The oil rich Arab-Muslims could not win a war with guns and soldiers, so they
changed their fight tactics to withholding barrels of oil to begin an economic
war referred to as the Arab Oil Embargo. Remember the shortage of oil in
the ’70s when people were concerned about having enough fuel to ride
a motorbike? Global military might had, at this stage, become dependent
on oil. If you didn’t have a lot of oil, you didn’t have a
strong military or a strong economy to pay for the military. The embargo
was a wise hand for the Arab nations to play and it would be astute for
Western countries to remember it and make policy accordingly. In fact,
this paragraph is so important it should be surrounded with neon lights!
So Arab nations quadrupled the price of oil almost overnight and Arab oil production
was also reduced. Countries were evaluated on whether they were the Arab
nations’ friends, enemies, or neutral, and oil was distributed accordingly.
It was the Arabs’ version of the modern day President George W Bush’s
mantra “you’re either with us or against us.” The Arab
version of Bush’s mantra worked very successfully for them since
they literally almost had a royal flush. America, obviously considered
an enemy, fell into economic stagnation and high inflation.
Enticed by Saudi Arabia’s new oil strike and blackmailed by the threat
of not having oil, the nine countries of the then European Community jointly
endorsed a Franco-Arab resolution on November 1973, siding with the Arabs against
Israel. They wanted to be classified “friend” to ensure oil supply.
This was the fork in the path that led to the mass Muslim migration we see
in Europe today.
The Parliamentary Association for Euro-Arab Cooperation was
founded in 1974 to consummate this new Euro-Arab unity. This organization
had 600 members in 18 national Parliaments from the countries of
the European Union and the European Parliament itself. This became
a powerful Arab lobbying organization and was later enforced with
the Euro-Arab Dialogue, which ensured that the Arabs’ anti-Israel
policies were adopted and accommodations were made for the millions
of Muslims who were beginning to migrate to Europe through this new
alliance.
Europe, in exchange for oil, agreed to accommodate the Muslim immigrants’ cultural
nuances beginning with the change of textbooks to conform to the Middle Eastern
and Islamic world view. The hope of assimilation of Muslims in European culture
extended into all forms of media including television, newspapers, radio, university,
schools… basically into every aspect of life. Even military and nuclear
training was provided. Heck, France even constructed a nuclear reactor in Iraq
- which Israel later destroyed.
However, Europeans are generally considered tolerant of race,
religion, and creed. Muslim fanatics are not. Even moderate Muslims
are scorned by fanatics for not being “Muslim enough.” Right
or wrong, how can anyone rationally expect Europeans, who proudly
lay topless on the beach, to possibly peacefully co-exist with a
massive Muslim population that is known for stoning women who show
any skin beyond their face? It wouldn't be too far-fetched to see
a civil war between these two cultures over the right to bare breasts.
The European Union had so many interests in the Arab world
that when terrorism broke out in Palestine they had a vested interest
in siding with the Arab world instead of opposing Islamic terrorism.
I don’t want to digress into who is right and who is wrong
in the Israel/Palestinian issue, but merely wish to point out that
the EU had a vested interest in siding with the Arabs and the Americans
had a vested interest in siding with Israel. Among many things, Israel
was a democratic ally in the heart of the Middle East, which is considered
a very strategic position to maintain stability from an American
point of view.
In fact, President George W Bush has actually been the first
American President to officially recognize and support a Palestinian
state.
So how do France and the United Nations tie
together in this new world? Besides the French Ambassadors to Iraq
this month coming under legal investigation and admitting to taking
substantial bribes from Saddam to ensure the UN sanctions were not
implemented, the Arab-Franco alliance had grander plans to use the
United Nations to push their agenda. They gathered 56 countries to
form the Organization of the Islamic Conference, which would have
total control of some of the issues at the United Nations. Israel
was at the top of the agenda.
This level of strategic organization behind the
scenes of the United Nations may help explain why the United Nations,
this supposedly “peace-keeping” organization, has had
such virulent opposition to defining “terrorism”… even
after the world has experienced the greatest expansion of terrorism
in history over the past decade and thousands of lives lost. If
terrorists are used as your countries underground foot soldiers
who push your agenda, you would hardly want to hamstring them.
Arab nations are holding another hand in the deck in this new world
of global terrorism and with a simultaneous effort to push oil
prices up, they are now able to take the West out on two fronts
in a renewed and underhanded fight.
It may be more effective for the Arab cause though if they could silence the
new Iranian President from his public displays of radical “death
to Israel, death to America” statements to ensure they can continue
with their propaganda to make the US look like the bad guys while continuing
to strategically position themselves. Perhaps the Iranian President’s
place is to rally the masses and keep them motivated to continue terrorist
attacks.
I can sympathize with moderate Muslims, many of whom I have
met around the world, who oppose and are terrified of extremists
also, but have to live every day under suspicion. I also sympathize
with many of the people of France who did not realize their leaders
sold them out many years ago to a culture that wants to annihilate
their ideals from within their own borders.
Well, France’s efforts to move away from America -
who, remember practices tolerance of race, religion, and creed -
created the strong Euro-Arab alliance they dreamed of. It was so
successful there are now over 5 million Muslim immigrants living
in France alone today. The Muslim rioters over the past 12 days have
burned down homes, nurseries, and churches in France. Guess Islam’s
master strategy to infiltrate through mass immigration instead of
riding in on horses to take over has gathered legs. The Muslims already
living in Europe can plot, orchestrate, and implement plans to burn
down the villages and commit terrorists acts while they already live
there. Meanwhile, the United Nations, which one could argue has never
been needed more, has proven to have been bribed at the highest levels
by oil money in exchange for not implementing the sanctions that
could have saved Iraq from war.
END
VISION
Your vision will become clear
only when you look into your heart.
Who looks outside, dreams.
Who looks inside, awakens.
- Carl Jung
Gabrielle Reilly Weekly ©
